How to encourage healthy conflict
I’ve come to believe in the value of conflict as I see leaders struggle with it. It wasn’t always that way for me; early in my career I viewed conflict as a negative thing. I worked at a company for many years where conflict was avoided. Employees tended to agree in public meetings, but have one-to-one meetings afterwards where they vented their real opinions. It could be devastating to important corporate initiatives.
I’ve come to know other organizations that encourage conflict, often as a method of coming to agreement or boosting innovation and creativity. Some do this well, I know. Some others shut out the more sensitive or introverted workers who can’t seem to enjoy the raucousness of the debate or haven’t figured out their way into the extraverted, loud, hearty, and/or heated debate, thus their ideas and voices are lost.
Unhealthy conflicts (those that are avoided or shut out some ideas) can cause an organization to become dysfunctional. There might be a decrease in authentic connections, triggering a negative impact to productivity with behind-the-scenes scheming or passive behaviors that slow or stop progress.
Consider the organization you lead. Are the conflicts productive and respectful? Do they lead to outcomes that are beneficial? If not, unhealthy conflict can be turned around by a leader who is courageous enough to work hard at it. If you are willing to begin, here are some beginning ways that you can encourage healthy conflict:
Be intentional and have dialog: You can be intentional through your words and your actions. Model the behaviors you want to see in your organization to encourage healthy conflict. Setting aside time to dialog with your team about the value of conflict and what it means to have healthy, respectful conflict is a first step. Ask your team to hold you accountable to having healthy conflict, just as they hold each other accountable.
Set ground rules: What behaviors do you envision your team exhibiting during healthy conflict? Have a conversation up front, and together with the team to discuss what this looks like. Such ground rules as listening with respect, making sure everyone has their say, and staying on the topic are some suggestions. If the team will make final decisions about the things that are in conflict together, decide how it will be made: by majority vote, consensus, by the team leader or some other way? Make sure everyone agrees to decision methodology.
Notice and commend: Notice when you see the preferred behaviors exhibited. Commend people who are showing these behaviors publicly. Likewise, if someone on the team is continually exhibiting the kind of behaviors that derail team success at having healthy conflict, speak to them in private about what you observe and reinforce the behavioral standards the team has agreed to.
I’ve noticed that many leaders appreciate conflict but don’t know how to make sure it is productive and healthy. I hope some of these ideas help. What would you add to the list?









Good points. May I add that it helps to have a process. We teach the “Walk in the Woods” method for collaborative problem solving and conflict resolution. It is simple enough to be used at the personal or departmental level yet robust enough to be deployed in merger negotiations.
In short, the four steps to the Walk are: 1) everyone states their self interests; 2) areas of agreement (which almost always outnumber disagreements) are noted as enlarged interests; 3) in that context, possible ways to productively resolve the conflict are discussed, creating enlightened interests; and 4) those items that can now be agreed upon become aligned interests around which action is possible.
This Walk process puts a positive frame on conflict, ensures that people feel that they are genuinely heard, and focuses on the combined creative potential of the stakeholders to solve the problem, not fighting each other.
Eric, great add, great process. Thanks for your comments, very helpful for readers.
Hi Mary Jo – I used to think that all conflict was good and now I know better. Some types of conflict – like your example of shutting out the quieter people – is destructive and can have a large ripple effect. For example, the main parties come to an agreement and feel great but those around them are left in the wake of the storm with hurt feelings, distrust, and maybe anger.
Thank you for sharing these purposeful actions to healthy conflict!
Hi Erika, nice to see you here. You’ve wisely pointed out the destruction that unhealthy conflict can cause. And it takes a long time for teams and individuals to recover from those bad feelings. Thanks!
Two thoughts come to mind after reading this great article. 1. It takes a healthy and secure manager or C-level to encourage and welcome healthy work place conflict. Sadly, this does not exist and cannot happen overnight. 2. Most people’s experience with conflict is usually poor often stemming back to what was modeled in their families. It can be a long road for people before they view conflict as a healthy part of the work place experience.
This is a helpful article! It reinforces a concept mentioned in Harvard Business Review’s article Stress Test Your Strategy: How are you generating creative tension? As businesses grow in today’s marketplace, there will most definitely be conflict. How organizations manage that conflict is critically important. The leverage of talent is paramount today and can best be achieved by cohesive teamwork and relentless collaboration.
This is a great post! I embrace conflict as opportunity for growth, but it has been a learning experience for me over the past few years. There is much to be said about learning to approach conflict from a productive approach rather than just picking a fight, whether needed or not.
I have found that the intentionality behind the dialogue really helps set the stage and the expectation for an outcome that is more helpful than hurtful.
In order to encourage healthy dialogue, it can be helpful to appoint a different “devil’s advocate” in meetings. That way, the same person (and it usually is the same person) is not always bringing up negative points, and those who are more reticent can be made comfortable using the “negative” muscle when it is their job to do so.
Hi Sam, I agree with both points. And it can be learned. I know lots of healthy and secure leaders who are able to promote conflict in this way – its a facilitation skill that can definitely be learned. If they feel like they can’t do it, there may be someone on their staff (or a consultant/coach) who can.
Robin, thanks for the reference. I’ll look it up
Dale, I love the idea of intentionality too. Thanks for adding that, because it does do a lot of good for lots of communication situations.
Dolores, thanks for the suggestion. I’m sure there are situations where this could be useful.